Overhauling Cultural Amnesia: Rebuild the Empires Within
![]() |
Reprogramming psychological inheritance of colonised minds |
What does it mean to be free? Not free in the way history books tell it, not the freedom of flags raised and anthems sung, not the freedom of borders drawn and treaties signed. I speak of freedom, a deeper one—the freedom of mind. And I ask you, ARE WE TRULY FREE?
For centuries, outsiders came to our land with their ships
and swords, with their guns and laws; they took our riches, reshaped our
cities, left scars upon the earth. But what they truly sought was something far
greater, something more enduring (Than any relationship in Hauz Khas, lol)—the
mastery over our minds. And that, I fear, they have not fully relinquished.
Yes, the Brits left a long ago. But did they really?
Look around you. The language in which I speak, the very
words that shape my thoughts, the structures that dictate our knowledge, our
success, our aspirations—do they not still bear the imprint of their makers? (I
am pretty sure everyone of you considers Winston Churchill as great
leader, but HATE Adolf Hitler, but what they both truly did was
genocide!). This, my friend, is the true colonisation. (Not of land, but of
self) And here we are, a proud civilisation of over a billion people, still
confused about whether to say “Hello” or “Namaste” when answering the
phone. Man who smoked around 4 million Indians, and his cigar!
I mean, here’s a quick reflection: Why is that when an
Indian speaks perfect English, we say, “Oh, he must have had his education
abroad” but when a French guy speaks English like they’re choking on
croissant, we say, “My god, how exotic!” Now, you see, they made us
further believe that sophistication comes with British accent. That wisdom can
only be found when you speak without pronouncing the ‘Ts’, or if you read
Western books. That if something wasn’t approved by some guy named Lord
Macaulay, it’s probably useless. And you know what’s worse? WE FELL FOR IT.
And history—ahh, don’t get me started on history. According
to British textbooks, before they arrived, we were just a bunch of
snake-charmers and people who worshipped stones & beasts, waiting for Queen
Victoria to civilise us. Really? REALLY? When Henry VIII was busy
changing his wives, India witnessed Maharana Pratap. His legendary
horse, Chetak, is very well enough to rebut their narratives. How did
all this happen then? You see, the educational institutions established by the
British were the primary channels through which this colonisation of mind was
orchestrated. The curriculum, designed to produce clerks and administrators who
could serve the colonial administration, did not merely impart technical
skills; it also reoriented the way knowledge was understood (Mind you, this is
very important to understand). The classical texts of Sanskrit literature, the
epic narratives of Mahabharata and Ramayana, were either
dismissed as relics of a bygone era or reinterpreted through the lens of
Western historical criticism. The consequence was a gradual erosion of
indigenous intellectual framework (Sam Pitroda, probably?). It was a
devaluation of one’s own cultural heritage that slowly permeated through the
classes of society, as evidently dictated by various left-wing historians.
I will now tell you my favourite colonised mindset; our
obsession with foreign approval (Sorry V-dem or Freedom house,
whosoever it may concern, it’s not going to work this time). If a scientist
invents something in India, he would be just mentally unstable for people who
was productive for a while (This is for a scientist! Ohh lord, spare my guy Rahul
Gandhi from Indian insults) But if we find someone who is not a citizen
of India, but is of Indian origin, and that person does something, the comment
section is flooded with “Pride of India! India’s Genius!” I want to ask
such people if their brain is run by foreign visa. Was it not working properly
until they got a visa? Another thing about the same, and this is what I
encounter the most. The most! Let’s take a simple situation: You go to a decent
restaurant, and they give you fork and knives with your biryani and tandoori
chicken—what do you do?
1.
Use fork and knife, struggling like and idiot (I
can only imagine the bite this would give, rofl)
2.
Eat with your hands like a normal human being
(You just won’t)
3.
Look around first to make sure no ghosts are
watching, then eat with your hands. (Yes, the best practicable option)
If you answered (3), congratulations! You are officially 50%
decolonised! If it’s (1), I’m sorry boss, I wasn’t familiar with your game (You
Slayyy!) People with (2), massive respect.
But I would always argue that the colonisation of mind
started way earlier, even before the expeditions of East India Company. It was the
Delhi Sultanate and the nasty, brutish barbarians that ruled after. Men of
Timurid and Mongol blood, who are called as “Martyrs” by Uddhav Thackeray,
the Mughals! Aurangzeb literally ruled with resolute fanaticism, and
still, is somehow posed relevant by many radical elements in society including
the learned ones, too. This is true colonisation of mind!
They defend his cruelty under the umbrella of architecture (If
anything, I think their ability to misunderstand things is a work of art), rapes
and pillaging by arguing that he brought jalebi, gulab jamun, samosa to
the dinner tables. Making sense of their defence is like eating dal with
chopsticks (Also, if a Brit pronounces it as ‘dalll’, people would say “How
Impressive!” Even if he butchers the word like EIC butchered India’s economy
then) Jokes aside, how is a tyrant like Aurang still relevant even today?
It’s like a Jew living in Germany saying Hitler was a misunderstood
leader (According to them, he only asked for a ‘glass of juice’ but they heard “Gas
the jews!”) Aurangzeb literally ordered the destructions of many Hindu temples,
forced non-muslims to pay much higher taxes, killed Sambhaji Maharaj and
Guru Tegh Bahadur and many others mercilessly, in most inhumane ways
possible, and what not. And still there exists an Aurangzeb Road in
Delhi. Let’s us agree that history is as much as reflection of our values as it
is a record of past deeds. And if defending him or any other Islamic tyrant
means ignoring the prickly details in favour of a polished narrative, then I
suppose we must all take a long, hard look on what we are celebrating. Because,
my dear defenders, if you must cling to a legacy built on controversy, at least
do so with awareness that glittering revisionism rarely covers up the prickles
underneath.Benchmark for modern-day Timurid filth in India
Another such reflection is, Bakhtiyar Khalji, who demolished the mighty Nalanda University, has a town under his name where the university was, called as ‘Bakhtiyarpur’. Mind you, it burned for months and months, imagine the industrial scale knowledge that disappeared in thin air! And we still are not willing to change the names of such places! Well, Connaught Place was changed to Rajiv Chowk in an instance. And I would argue every other residential colony, colleges, or even roads end with Nehru in India, which is good but then again unnecessary (I wonder if any road in Lutyens’ Delhi would ever be named after Veer Savarkar) What is so difficult? Do we as Indians have selective dementia that we keep forgetting who we were? Or do we just yearn to bring the ruling political right out of power, that in the process, we are rejecting everything that was our identity, and promoting what is not ours?
So, my dear readers, I ask you—when will we truly decolonise
our minds? When will we stop thinking that a British accent means intelligence?
When will we stop acting like our own history is a side character in someone
else’s story? When will we finally realise that success doesn’t mean “going abroad”
and culture doesn’t mean “eating with fork”? And what shall we strive to avoid such
dangerous plague?
![]() |
Everybody's got a choice, but they also possess a Nelson's eye! |
Comments
Post a Comment